[1]齐静静,李家宁,尹志清,等.油气集输站库雷电防护能力模糊评价模型研究[J].电瓷避雷器,2019,(06):49-54.[doi:10.16188/j.isa.1003-8337.2019.06.009]
 QI Jingjing,LI Jianing,YIN Zhiqing,et al.Research on the Fuzzy Evaluation Model of Lightning Protection Capability in Oil and Gas Gathering & Transportation Station[J].,2019,(06):49-54.[doi:10.16188/j.isa.1003-8337.2019.06.009]
点击复制

油气集输站库雷电防护能力模糊评价模型研究()
分享到:

《电瓷避雷器》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年06期
页码:
49-54
栏目:
避雷器
出版日期:
2019-12-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the Fuzzy Evaluation Model of Lightning Protection Capability in Oil and Gas Gathering & Transportation Station
作者:
齐静静 李家宁 尹志清 刘福兴
(中国石油化工股份有限公司胜利油田分公司技术检测中心, 山东 东营 257000)
Author(s):
QI Jingjing LI Jianing YIN Zhiqing LIU Fuxing
(Shengli Oilfield Technology Inspection Center, SINOPLIUC, Dongying 257000, China)
关键词:
模糊数学 隶属度 模糊合成算子 综合评价模型
Keywords:
Fuzzy mathematics membership fuzzy synthetic operator comprehensive evaluation model
DOI:
10.16188/j.isa.1003-8337.2019.06.009
摘要:
模糊综合评价方法适用于解决一系列受多重因素影响事物的决策问题。模糊综合评价流程包括确定影响因子、计算因子权重、构建模糊矩阵、进行模糊运算、得出评价结论等步骤。在评价模型中,选择不同的模糊算子,评价结果会表现不同的差异性。而对于模糊综合评价的结果,一般采用最大隶属度原则。当隶属度之间差异不明显时,最大隶属度原则可能会出现失效的情况。本文以胜利油田临海油气集输站库雷电防护能力的模糊评价体系作为研究对象,当确定最大隶属度失效时采用加权平均算法可以得到最佳评价结果。同时研究选取不同模糊算子时,采用最大乘积可以对结果做出最为明确的判断。
Abstract:
The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is suitable for solving a series of decision problems which are affected by multiple factors. In the process of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, such steps as determining the influencing factor, calculating factor weight, constructing fuzzy matrix, fuzzy operation and drawing evaluation conclusion are included. In the evaluation model, different fuzzy operators are selected, and the evaluation results show different differences. For the result of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, the principle of maximum membership is generally adopted. When the degree of membership difference is not obvious, the maximum membership principle may be invalid. In this paper, the weighted average algorithm can be used to obtain the best results when determining the maximum membership failure of the oil and gas gathering station of Sheng Li oil field is used as the research object. At the same time, when the different fuzzy operators are selected, the maximum product can be used to make the most explicit judgment.

参考文献/References:

[1] 国际电工委员会.雷电防护-第2部分:风险管理:IEC 62305-2[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2010.
[2] 殷娴,胡颖,周清倩,等.云南省地震高发区雷灾风险分析与区划研究[J].灾害学,2017(4):67-72. YAN Xian, HU Ying, ZHOU Qingqian, et al. The thunder disaster risk analysis and zoning of earthquake high incidence area in Yunnan province[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2017(4): 67-72.
[3] 余蜀豫,任艳,覃彬全.基于模糊数学的重庆地区雷电灾害风险评估方法研究[J].灾害学,2015(2):75-78, 84. YU Shuyu, REN Yan, QIN Binquan. Research on the lightning risk assessment method for Chongqing based on fuzzy mathematics[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2015(2): 75-78, 84.
[4] 罗骕翾,杨仲江,华晨辉.基于模糊数学理论的既有普通建筑雷灾风险评估[J].电瓷避雷器,2014(4):60-65. LUO Suxuan, YANG Zhongjiang, HUA Chenhui. Risk assessment of lightning disaster of existing ordinary buildings based on the fuzzy mathematics theory[J]. Insulators and Surge Arresters, 2014(4): 60-65.
[5] 焦雪,冯民学,王尧钧,等.雷电灾害风险评估系统开发与应用[J].灾害学,2011, 26(2):72-76. JIAO Xue, FENG Minxue, WANG Yaojun, et al. Development and application of lightning risk assessment system[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2011, 26(2): 72-76.
[6] 彭本红,武柏宇,屠羽.中国基本公共气象服务均等化水平现状--基于多层次灰色关联的实证研究[J].气象科技,2016, 44(06):1030-1036. PENG Benhong, WU Baiyu, TU Yu. Current situation of equalization of basic public weather service level in China:an empirical study based on multi-level grey correlation[J]. Meteorological Science and Technology, 2016, 44(06): 1030-1036.
[7] 王淑一,邹善勇,王囝囝.大连市雷电灾害风险评估体系指标量化方法[J].气象科技,2016, 44(03):510-516. WANG Shuyi, ZOU Shanyong, WANG Jianjian. Quantification methods of evaluation index system for lightning risk assessment in dalian[J]. Meteorological Science and Technology, 2016, 44(03): 510-516.
[8] 蔡清谊.基于人工神经网络的洪水预报与灾度评价研究——以怀洪新河为例[D].合肥:合肥工业大学,2007.
[9] 华晨辉,杨仲江,罗骕翾,等.基于BP神经网络的普通建筑雷灾风险评估[J].电瓷避雷器,2014(5):60-65. HUA Chenhui, YANG Zhongjiang, LUO Suxuan, et al. Risk assessment method of lightning disaster about ordinary buildings based on the BP neural network process[J]. Insulators and Surge Arresters, 2014(5): 60-65.
[10] 林彬彬.建筑物雷击特性研究及在风险管理中的应用[D].南京:南京信息工程大学,2014.
[11] 邱东.最大隶属原则的有效度与加权平均原则的应用—模糊统计评判中判评原则的比较分析[J].统计研究,1989, 6(2):50-54. QIU Dong. The validity of maximum membership principle and the application of weighted average principle--Comparative analysis of judgment principles in fuzzy statistical evaluation[J]. Statistical Research, 1989, 6(2): 50-54.
[12] 谢丽娟,陈俏.模糊综合评判中合成算子的选取[J].科协论坛:下半月,2012(9):103-104. XIE Lijuan, CHEN Qiao. Selection of synthetic operators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation[J]. Science & Technology Association Forum, 2012(9): 103-104.
[13] 王静,董肖丽.模糊评价中最大隶属度原则的改进[J].河北水利,2011(2):27-28. WANG Jing, DONG Xiaoli. Improvement of maximum membership principle in fuzzy evaluation[J]. Hebei Water Resourses, 2011(2): 27-28.
[14] 朱小飞,王永君,李大军.模糊评价中最大隶属度原则有效性检验[J].测绘与空间地理信息,2016, 39(5):135-137. ZHU Xiaofei, WANG Yongjun, LI Dajun. The effectiveness test of the maximum membership principle in fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology, 2016, 39(5): 135-137.
[15] 孔繁钢,刘强,王冀星,等.基于改进BP神经网络算法的岸电电源智能输出控制的研究 [J]. 电网与清洁能源,2017,33(2):64-67. KONG Fangang, LIU Qiang, WANG Jixing, et al. Intelligent output control of shore power supply based on improved bp neural network algorithm [J]. Power System and Clean Energy,2017,33(2):64-67.
[16] 李玉琳,高志刚,韩延玲.模糊综合评价中权值确定和合成算子选择[J].计算机工程与应用,2006, 42(23):38-42. LI Yulin, GAO Zhigang, HAN Yanling. The determination of weight value and the choice ofcomposite operators in fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2006, 42(23): 38-42.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-04-17 作者简介:齐静静(1981—),女,博士研究生,高级工程师,主要从事雷电防护技术及相关研究工作。 基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(编号:2016YFC0802303)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-12-10